Did you ever have to make up your mind?
Jeff Goldstein submitted...
"Dear Nacho Expert,
Two vendors are offering nachos at this year's taste of Chicago. Which one is better?
Thanks."
This is not a bad question at all. First off, I want to say that there should be more nacho vendors. With all of the food there, no one should have to go far to get some nachos, and after seeing the vendors, there are many that could offer nachos. Unless that is a hypothetical situation, in which case I'm a little upset that you got me so worked up. Anyway, this seems like a simple question, but there is not such a simple answer. The right answer is, getting both is the best option. Every nacho dish has its own unique ins and outs. There are different aspects that can bring you closer to nacho bliss. If you want to get as close to true happiness as you can, then you must have both kinds. If you have to choose one, then is sucks to be you. That being said, it's pretty damn hard to have a nacho dish that doesn't offer something. If you truely have to decide on one, assess your criteria: crispiness, toppings, quantity, expected aftermath, etc. Expected aftermath is pretty important at a place like The Taste. You're outdoors with only some portapotties. It all depends on the other aspects and what you're willing to risk. This may seem like a somewhat vague answer to your question, but analysis needs to be done. I still say go with both. Nachos are very much like sexual partners: two is almost always better than one.